Address · Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
1724 Bayview Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Location
- 43.70964, -79.37696
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 15 May 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 149283 NNY 15 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 April 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 147244 NNY 15 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 June 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 153356 NNY 15 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24 149283 NNY 15 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 15 May 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 147244 NNY 15 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 April 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 8 June 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1710 Bayview Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 147244 NNY 15 SA · submitted 28 April 2021 · Closed · from registration SM32556 (Gairloch Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32556: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 147244 NNY 15 SA at 1710 Bayview Ave: Site Plan Application submitted to permit a 9-storey, mid-rise, mixed-use development, containing 197 apartment units and groundfloor retail space. The proposed GFA is 16,452 sqm (16,020 sqm residential GFA and 432 sqm retail GFA). The SPA application is related to Zoning By-law Amendment (ZBA) app… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 1718-1736 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 1718 BAYVIEW AVE
1734 Bayview Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 153356 NNY 15 OZ · submitted 8 June 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30080 (Toronto (Bayview and Eglinton) Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30080: A Zoning By-law amendment for the site located at 1718 Bayview Avenue. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ at 1734 Bayview Ave: Resubmission to include 5 additional lots to the north and south of the subject site have been acquired by the Owner. The expanded subject site now includes the properties municipally known as 1710, 1712, 1714, 1716 and 1736 Bayview Avenue. The revised proposal continues to propose a 9-storey (31.5… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: A Zoning By-law amendment for the site located at 1718 Bayview Avenue.
Matched fields
- address
- 1718 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 1718 BAYVIEW AVE
1734 Bayview Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 153356 NNY 15 OZ · submitted 8 June 2020 · Closed · from registration SM32556 (Gairloch Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32556: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 153356 NNY 15 OZ at 1734 Bayview Ave: Resubmission to include 5 additional lots to the north and south of the subject site have been acquired by the Owner. The expanded subject site now includes the properties municipally known as 1710, 1712, 1714, 1716 and 1736 Bayview Avenue. The revised proposal continues to propose a 9-storey (31.5… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 1718-1736 Bayview Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 1718-1736 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 1718 BAYVIEW AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 15
20 lobbied · 36 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 15% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 36 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 30% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.