Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZ
278 Sterling Rd; 1423 Bloor St W; 1425 Bloor St W; 1425A Bloor St W; 1427 Bloor St W; 1429 Bloor St W; 1431 Bloor St W; 1433 Bloor St W; 1435 Bloor St W; 1435-1437 Bloor St W; 1437 Bloor St W
- Status
- Council Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 13 April 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 278 Sterling Rd; 1423 Bloor St W; 1425 Bloor St W; 1425A Bloor St W; 1427 Bloor St W; 1429 Bloor St W; 1431 Bloor St W; 1433 Bloor St W; 1435 Bloor St W; 1435-1437 Bloor St W; 1437 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 13 April 2021
- Status
- Council Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 197 units; 14,635 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for an 18-storey, inclusive of a 6-storey podium, mixed-use building with a tota GFA of 14,635 square metres. A total of 197 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 17 will be rental units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Kingsett Capital · registration SM31065
Zoning By-law application and planning & engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31065: Zoning By-law application and planning & engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZ at 278 Sterling Rd: Proposal for an 18-storey, inclusive of a 6-storey podium, mixed-use building with a tota GFA of 14,635 square metres. A total of 197 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 17 will be rental units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law application and planning & engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1423-1437 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1423 BLOOR ST W
Kingsett Capital · registration SM31066
Zoning By-law application and planning & community engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31066: Zoning By-law application and planning & community engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZ at 278 Sterling Rd: Proposal for an 18-storey, inclusive of a 6-storey podium, mixed-use building with a tota GFA of 14,635 square metres. A total of 197 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 17 will be rental units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law application and planning & community engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1423-1437 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1423 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9 | Councillor staff | 6 | 0 | 26 January 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.