Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
278 Sterling Rd
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65688, -79.44793
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 20 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 201846 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 13 April 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZCouncil Approved · Approved
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 201846 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 20 August 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 21 139658 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 13 April 2021 | Council Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
278 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 139658 STE 09 OZ · submitted 13 April 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM31065 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31065: Zoning By-law application and planning & engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZ at 278 Sterling Rd: Proposal for an 18-storey, inclusive of a 6-storey podium, mixed-use building with a tota GFA of 14,635 square metres. A total of 197 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 17 will be rental units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law application and planning & engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1423-1437 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1423 BLOOR ST W
278 Sterling Rd · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
21 139658 STE 09 OZ · submitted 13 April 2021 · Council Approved · from registration SM31066 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31066: Zoning By-law application and planning & community engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 139658 STE 09 OZ at 278 Sterling Rd: Proposal for an 18-storey, inclusive of a 6-storey podium, mixed-use building with a tota GFA of 14,635 square metres. A total of 197 residential dwelling units are proposed, of which, 17 will be rental units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law application and planning & community engagement related matters for proposed development located at 1423-1437 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1423-1437 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1423 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.