Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 21 119823 WET 02 SA

Ward 2 · Stephen HolydayDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 24 February 2021; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 45 La Rose Ave
Ward: Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
Submitted: 24 February 2021
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Size stated in the description: 211 units
Related file: 16 270193 WET 04 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control application for an eight-storey residential building consisting of 211 dwelling units. The existing rental apartment building is proposed to be retained.This application is associated with the LPAT approved rezoning application, City's file no. 16 270193 WET 04 OZ, LPAT case no. PL 171144.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Richview Developments · registration SM27631
Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27631: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 119823 WET 02 SA at 45 La Rose Ave: Site Plan Control application for an eight-storey residential building consisting of 211 dwelling units. The existing rental apartment building is proposed to be retained.This application is associated with the LPAT approved rezoning application, City's file no. 16 270193 WET 04 OZ, LPAT case no. P… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave.
Matched fields
address
45 LA ROSE AVE
application_address
45 LA ROSE AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Holyday2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Holyday	Councillor staff	2	0	13 March 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Princess Management
SM36867 · 12 August 2025 · “45 La Rose Avenue”
Princess Management
SM36868 · 12 August 2025 · “45 La Rose Avenue”
Ironshore Group
SM24395 · 21 April 2017 · “45 La Rose Ave.”
Ironshore Group
SM24308 · 30 March 2017 · “45 La Rose Ave.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2

5 lobbied · 15 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2: 5 lobbied and 15 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	15	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.