Address · Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
45 La Rose Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 2 · Stephen Holyday
- Location
- 43.68608, -79.51587
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Holyday | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 13 March 2019 |
| Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 21 April 2017 |
| Stephen Holyday | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 29 September 2025 |
| Councillor Campbell | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 5 April 2017 |
| Stephen Holyday | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 18 September 2025 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36867 | Princess Management | 45 La Rose Avenue | Planning and Development Application; Minor Variance | 12 August 2025 – 12 August 2026 | 1 |
| SM36868 | Princess Management | 45 La Rose Avenue | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 12 August 2025 – 12 August 2026 | 2 |
| SM27631 | Richview Developments | 45 La Rose Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 11 February 2019 – 10 February 2022 | 2 |
| SM24395 | Ironshore Group | 45 La Rose Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 April 2017 – 7 June 2017 | 1 |
| SM24308 | Ironshore Group | 45 La Rose Ave. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 30 March 2017 – 9 April 2021 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 12 March 2026Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0110/26EYKOMB Appeal · Refused
- Submitted 24 February 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 119823 WET 02 SAOMB Appeal · In progress
- Submitted 22 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 270193 WET 04 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0110/26EYK Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 12 March 2026 | OMB Appeal Refused |
| 21 119823 WET 02 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 24 February 2021 | OMB Appeal In progress |
| 16 270193 WET 04 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 22 December 2016 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
45 La Rose Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A0110/26EYK · submitted 12 March 2026 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM36867 (Princess Management)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM36867: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0110/26EYK at 45 La Rose Ave: To construct an 8-storey apartment building that will contain 211residential units and one level of underground parking. The proposed building will be located along the west side of the property. The existing apartment building located along the on the east side of the property will be maintained. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance Application
Matched fields
- address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
- application_address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
45 La Rose Ave · Minor variance (MV)
A0110/26EYK · submitted 12 March 2026 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM36868 (Princess Management)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM36868: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance application. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0110/26EYK at 45 La Rose Ave: To construct an 8-storey apartment building that will contain 211residential units and one level of underground parking. The proposed building will be located along the west side of the property. The existing apartment building located along the on the east side of the property will be maintained. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 45 La Rose Avenue - Minor Variance application.
Matched fields
- address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
- application_address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
45 La Rose Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 119823 WET 02 SA · submitted 24 February 2021 · OMB Appeal · from registration SM27631 (Richview Developments)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27631: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 119823 WET 02 SA at 45 La Rose Ave: Site Plan Control application for an eight-storey residential building consisting of 211 dwelling units. The existing rental apartment building is proposed to be retained.This application is associated with the LPAT approved rezoning application, City's file no. 16 270193 WET 04 OZ, LPAT case no. P… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
- application_address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
45 La Rose Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270193 WET 04 OZ · submitted 22 December 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM24395 (Ironshore Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24395: Application in support of redevelopment of 45 La Rose Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270193 WET 04 OZ at 45 La Rose Ave: Proposal for a 7 storey building containing a total of 187 units. The existing 16 storey rental building which contains 156 rental units would be retained onsite. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application in support of redevelopment of 45 La Rose Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
- application_address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
45 La Rose Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 270193 WET 04 OZ · submitted 22 December 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM27631 (Richview Developments)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM27631: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 270193 WET 04 OZ at 45 La Rose Ave: Proposal for a 7 storey building containing a total of 187 units. The existing 16 storey rental building which contains 156 rental units would be retained onsite. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assist with development application for 45 La Rose Ave.
Matched fields
- address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
- application_address
- 45 LA ROSE AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 2
7 lobbied · 115 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 115 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 2
5 lobbied · 15 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 2
9 lobbied · 10 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 10 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.