Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 19 251094 NNY 18 SA
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 19 November 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 5995 Yonge St; 5997 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 19 November 2019
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 443 units
- Related file
- 19 251072 NNY 18 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan application to permit a 40 storey high rise mixed use building. The proposed building contains 443 residential units, 911 sqm of indoor amenity space, 888 sqm of outdoor amenity space, and 174 parking spaces through 3 levels of underground parking.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Sorbara Group of Companies · registration SM27589
5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27589: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 251094 NNY 18 SA at 5995 Yonge St: Site Plan application to permit a 40 storey high rise mixed use building. The proposed building contains 443 residential units, 911 sqm of indoor amenity space, 888 sqm of outdoor amenity space, and 174 parking spaces through 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts
Matched fields
- address
- 5995-5997 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5995 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily Cheng | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 4 September 2024 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.