Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
5997 Yonge St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.78895, -79.41745
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 3 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 233901 NNY 18 CDUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 19 November 2019Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 19 251072 NNY 18 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 November 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 251094 NNY 18 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 16 May 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 156153 NNY 24 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 233901 NNY 18 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 3 November 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 19 251072 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 19 251094 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 November 2019 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 16 156153 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 16 May 2016 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
5995 Yonge St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
19 251072 NNY 18 OZ · submitted 19 November 2019 · Closed · from registration SM27589 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27589: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 251072 NNY 18 OZ at 5995 Yonge St: Zoning Bylaw Amendment application to permit a 40 storey high rise mixed use building. The proposed building contains 443 residential units, 911 sqm of indoor amenity space, 888 sqm of outdoor amenity space, and 174 parking spaces through 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts
Matched fields
- address
- 5995-5997 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5995 YONGE ST
5995 Yonge St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 251094 NNY 18 SA · submitted 19 November 2019 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM27589 (Sorbara Group of Companies)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27589: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 251094 NNY 18 SA at 5995 Yonge St: Site Plan application to permit a 40 storey high rise mixed use building. The proposed building contains 443 residential units, 911 sqm of indoor amenity space, 888 sqm of outdoor amenity space, and 174 parking spaces through 3 levels of underground parking. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5995-5997 Yonge St - Development efforts
Matched fields
- address
- 5995-5997 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5995 YONGE ST
48 Cummer Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 156153 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 16 May 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM24361 (Ghods Builders Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24361: Proposed mixed-use highrise development at 5959 Yonge Street, Toronto. Appealed to the OMB with OMB hearing scheduled for December 2017. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 156153 NNY 24 OZ at 48 Cummer Ave: The purpose of the Offical Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications is to permit 4 residential and mixed use buildings with heights of 43, 31, 29, and 25 storeys. The applicant is proposing a total of 1,542 residential units and 1,902 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing the development … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Proposed mixed-use highrise development at 5959 Yonge Street, Toronto. Appealed to the OMB with OMB hearing scheduled for December 2017.
Matched fields
- address
- 5959 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5959 YONGE ST
48 Cummer Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 156153 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 16 May 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM24362 (Ghods Builders Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24362: Regarding application submitted on behalf of 5959 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 156153 NNY 24 OZ at 48 Cummer Ave: The purpose of the Offical Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications is to permit 4 residential and mixed use buildings with heights of 43, 31, 29, and 25 storeys. The applicant is proposing a total of 1,542 residential units and 1,902 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing the development … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Regarding application submitted on behalf of 5959 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 5959 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5959 YONGE ST
48 Cummer Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 156153 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 16 May 2016 · OMB Approved · from registration SM24365 (Ghods Builders Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM24365: Regarding application submitted by 5959 Yonge Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 156153 NNY 24 OZ at 48 Cummer Ave: The purpose of the Offical Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications is to permit 4 residential and mixed use buildings with heights of 43, 31, 29, and 25 storeys. The applicant is proposing a total of 1,542 residential units and 1,902 parking spaces. The applicant is proposing the development … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Regarding application submitted by 5959 Yonge Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 5959 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 5959 YONGE ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 18
1 lobbied · 5 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.