lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 19 236435 ESC 22 OZ

2350-2362 Kennedy Rd; 3850 Sheppard Ave E; 3900 Sheppard Ave E

Status
Council Approved
Approved
Submitted
15 October 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
73
31 meetings · 21 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2350-2362 Kennedy Rd; 3850 Sheppard Ave E; 3900 Sheppard Ave E
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
15 October 2019
Status
Council Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
4,372 units
Related file
17 181232 ESC 40 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Redevelopment of Agincourt Mall lands comprising of 8 new blocks on a plan of subdivision, new public roads and parklands. High density mixed-use buildings proposed on 6 blocks and parkland on 2 blocks. Proposal includes 4372 residential units, a day care facility, retail and office uses. Concurrent Plan of Subdivision application 19 236443 ESC 22 SB.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 73 communications · 31 meetings · 21 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt20
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt7
  • Office of Councillor Lee5
  • Councillor Lai4
  • Councillor Nick Mantas4
  • Office of Councillor Kelly4
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Councillor Ainslie3
Data table· 22 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council20520 July 2022
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council7627 September 2017
Office of Councillor LeeCouncillor staff5322 August 2017
Councillor LaiCouncillor staff4125 November 2021
Councillor Nick MantasCouncillor staff401 April 2022
Office of Councillor KellyCouncillor staff4223 June 2017
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council4329 November 2018
Councillor AinslieCouncillor staff3022 November 2021
Councillor ThompsonCouncillor staff3124 November 2021
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff3212 July 2019
Councillor KarygiannisCouncillor staff2129 November 2019
Councillor Karygiannis, Ward 22Councillor staff2110 January 2019
Councillor McKelvieCouncillor staff2122 November 2021
Ward 24 Scarborough-GuildwoodMember of council2017 June 2019
Councillor MantasCouncillor staff1027 January 2021
Office of Councillor CarrollCouncillor staff1012 July 2019
Ward 21 Scarborough CentreMember of council115 June 2019
Ward 23 Scarborough NorthMember of council1128 February 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council1121 May 2019
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council1116 August 2017
Nick MantasCouncillor staff103 July 2024
Nick MantasMember of council118 July 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.