lobbyTO

Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas

3850 Sheppard Ave E

Registrations naming this address
1
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
73
22 offices contacted
Applications at this address
4
1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Location
43.78393, -79.29225
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

1

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt20
  • Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt7
  • Office of Councillor Lee5
  • Councillor Lai4
  • Councillor Nick Mantas4
  • Office of Councillor Kelly4
  • Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt4
  • Councillor Ainslie3
Data table· 22 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council20520 July 2022
Ward 40 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council7627 September 2017
Office of Councillor LeeCouncillor staff5322 August 2017
Councillor LaiCouncillor staff4125 November 2021
Councillor Nick MantasCouncillor staff401 April 2022
Office of Councillor KellyCouncillor staff4223 June 2017
Ward 39 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council4329 November 2018
Councillor AinslieCouncillor staff3022 November 2021
Councillor ThompsonCouncillor staff3124 November 2021
Mayor's OfficeCouncillor staff3212 July 2019
Councillor KarygiannisCouncillor staff2129 November 2019
Councillor Karygiannis, Ward 22Councillor staff2110 January 2019
Councillor McKelvieCouncillor staff2122 November 2021
Ward 24 Scarborough-GuildwoodMember of council2017 June 2019
Councillor MantasCouncillor staff1027 January 2021
Office of Councillor CarrollCouncillor staff1012 July 2019
Ward 21 Scarborough CentreMember of council115 June 2019
Ward 23 Scarborough NorthMember of council1128 February 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council1121 May 2019
Ward 41 Scarborough-Rouge RiverMember of council1116 August 2017
Nick MantasCouncillor staff103 July 2024
Nick MantasMember of council118 July 2024
All registrations· 1 row
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM22442North American Development Group3850 Sheppard Avenue EastPlanning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…9 November 2015 – 31 December 202673

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

4
Data table· 4 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
19 236435 ESC 22 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)15 October 2019Council Approved
Approved
19 236443 ESC 22 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)15 October 2019Draft Plan Approved
Approved
17 181232 ESC 40 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)15 June 2017Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
11 316949 ESC 40 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)28 November 2011Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied8Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.