Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 186554 STE 10 SA

15 Duncan St; 150 Pearl St; 158 Pearl St

Ward 10 · Ausma MalikDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: NOAC Issued; Approved
Submitted: 10 July 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 15 Duncan St; 150 Pearl St; 158 Pearl St
Ward: Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted: 10 July 2019
Status: NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded: Approved
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 482 units; 3,975 m² gross floor area
Related file: 16 269407 STE 20 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval application for a 57-storey mixed-use building containing 482 residential units and 3,975.3 sq. m of non-residential gross floor area, and 114 parking spaces in 4 levels of underground parking. The existing heritage buildings are being conserved and incorporated into the building podium.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Conservatory Group · registration SM23941
Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23941: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 186554 STE 10 SA at 150 Pearl St: Site Plan Approval application for a 57-storey mixed-use building containing 482 residential units and 3,975.3 sq. m of non-residential gross floor area, and 114 parking spaces in 4 levels of underground parking. The existing heritage buildings are being conserved and incorporated into the building… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building.
Matched fields
address
150-158 PEARL ST
application_address
150 PEARL ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Economic Development and Culture1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Economic Development and Culture	City staff	1	1	16 July 2018

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
SM23704 · 16 August 2016 · “158 Pearl St.”
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
SM22878 · 10 March 2016 · “158 Pearl Street”
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
SM22879 · 10 March 2016 · “158 Pearl Street”
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario
SM22865 · 7 March 2016 · “158 Pearl Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10

66 lobbied · 165 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied3%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10: 66 lobbied and 165 matched unlobbied applications in 37 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	66	—	100% (n=5)	0%	3%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	165	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.04

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.