Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
15 Duncan St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64778, -79.38826
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Development and Culture | City staff | 1 | 1 | 16 July 2018 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23941 | Conservatory Group | 15 Duncan Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 July 2018 – 31 December 2022 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 10 July 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 186554 STE 10 SANOAC Issued · Approved
- Submitted 21 December 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 269407 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19 186554 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 10 July 2019 | NOAC Issued Approved |
| 16 269407 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
150 Pearl St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 186554 STE 10 SA · submitted 10 July 2019 · NOAC Issued · from registration SM23941 (Conservatory Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23941: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 186554 STE 10 SA at 150 Pearl St: Site Plan Approval application for a 57-storey mixed-use building containing 482 residential units and 3,975.3 sq. m of non-residential gross floor area, and 114 parking spaces in 4 levels of underground parking. The existing heritage buildings are being conserved and incorporated into the building… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 150-158 PEARL ST
- application_address
- 150 PEARL ST
158 Pearl St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 269407 STE 20 OZ · submitted 21 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23941 (Conservatory Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23941: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 269407 STE 20 OZ at 158 Pearl St: Revised proposal for rezoning to allow a 58 storey mixed-use building containing 480 residential units (reduced from 610 units in initial proposal) and 3,915.9 sq. m of non-residential GFA, with 4 levels of underground parking. This application is the subject of an appeal to the LPAT (Case No. PL17… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning application submitted to permit redevelopment of the lands municipally known as 150-158 Pearl Street and 15 Duncan Street for a 59 storey mixed-use building.
Matched fields
- address
- 150-158 PEARL ST
- application_address
- 150 PEARL ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.