Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)

Development application 19 154828 STE 13 CD

10 Mutual St; 30 Mutual St; 88 Queen St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 15 May 2019; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Addresses: 10 Mutual St; 30 Mutual St; 88 Queen St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 15 May 2019
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 407 units
Related file: 15 270190 STE 27 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Draft Plan Of Condominium application for a newly constructed mixed-use building containing 407 dwelling units.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.
SM36608 · 7 May 2025 · “30 Mutual Street”
Fitzrovia Real Estate Inc.
SM36593 · 29 April 2025 · “30 Mutual Street”
Fitzrovia Residential Inc.
SM35884 · 3 September 2024 · “88 Queen Street East”
88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.
SM35761 · 16 July 2024 · “88 Queen Street East.”
88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.
SM27935 · 28 March 2019 · “88 Queen Street East.”
Queen Developments Inc.
SM25155 · 12 October 2017 · “88 Queen Street East”
St. Thomas Commercial Developments Incorporated
SM21764 · 8 May 2015 · “88 Queen Street East.”
The Daniels Corporation
SM16592 · 20 June 2011 · “30 Mutual Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.