Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

30 Mutual St

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 3 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 16; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.65416, -79.37486
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.SM36608 · 7 May 202514
The Daniels CorporationSM16592 · 20 June 20112
Fitzrovia Real Estate Inc.SM36593 · 29 April 20250

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Shelter & Support Services6
Municipal Licensing and Services4
Chris Moise4
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale2

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Shelter & Support Services	City staff	6	0	9 July 2025
Municipal Licensing and Services	City staff	4	0	17 September 2025
Chris Moise	Councillor staff	4	0	17 June 2025
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	2	2	20 June 2011

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM36608	88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.	30 Mutual Street	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	7 May 2025 – 7 April 2026	14
SM36593	Fitzrovia Real Estate Inc.	30 Mutual Street	Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…	29 April 2025 – 29 April 2027	0
SM16592	The Daniels Corporation	30 Mutual Street	Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study	20 June 2011 – 31 December 2011	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 11 December 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0074/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 15 May 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 154828 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 29 June 2017Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0061/17TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 6 March 2017Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0264/17TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 7 April 2016Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0403/16TEYApproved with Conditions · Approved

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
B0074/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	11 December 2023	Closed Approved
19 154828 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	15 May 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0061/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	29 June 2017	Closed Approved
A0264/17TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	6 March 2017	Closed Approved
A0403/16TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	7 April 2016	Approved with Conditions Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.