Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

88 Queen St E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 5; 4 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 20; 7 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 8; No published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.65353, -79.37481
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.SM35761 · 16 July 202410
88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.SM27935 · 28 March 20198
Queen Developments Inc.SM25155 · 12 October 20172
Fitzrovia Residential Inc.SM35884 · 3 September 20240
St. Thomas Commercial Developments IncorporatedSM21764 · 8 May 20150

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Fire Services10
Development Review3
Mayor John Tory3
Corporate Finance1
Transportation Services1
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 271
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1

Data table· 7 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Fire Services	City staff	10	0	2 October 2024
Development Review	City staff	3	1	16 September 2024
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	3	0	13 April 2021
Corporate Finance	City staff	1	0	6 April 2021
Transportation Services	City staff	1	0	18 May 2023
Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 27	Councillor staff	1	1	12 October 2017
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	12 October 2017

All registrations· 5 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM35884	Fitzrovia Residential Inc.	88 Queen Street East	Planning and Development; Combined Application	3 September 2024 – 31 December 2026	0
SM35761	88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.	88 Queen Street East.	Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application	16 July 2024 – 7 April 2026	10
SM27935	88 Queen Fitzrovia Inc.	88 Queen Street East.	Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application	28 March 2019 – 28 March 2027	8
SM25155	Queen Developments Inc.	88 Queen Street East	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	12 October 2017 – 12 October 2018	2
SM21764	St. Thomas Commercial Developments Incorporated	88 Queen Street East.	Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law	8 May 2015 – 31 March 2023	0

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 17 May 2024Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 24 150248 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 January 2024Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0007/24TEYConditional Consent · Approved
Submitted 16 October 2023Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0058/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 17 April 2023Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0389/23TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 22 August 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0974/22TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 4 May 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 141915 STE 13 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 15 May 2019Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 19 154828 STE 13 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 25 February 2019Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0015/19TEYClosed · Approved

Data table· 8 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
24 150248 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	17 May 2024	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0007/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	26 January 2024	Conditional Consent Approved
B0058/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	16 October 2023	Closed Approved
A0389/23TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	17 April 2023	Closed Approved
A0974/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	22 August 2022	Closed Approved
22 141915 STE 13 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	4 May 2022	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 154828 STE 13 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	15 May 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
B0015/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Consent (severance) (CO)	25 February 2019	Closed Approved

Linked lobbying registrations

No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13

4 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 13: 4 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

Lobbied184
Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

Lobbied79% n=24
Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

Lobbied15%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied25%

Data table· 2 rows

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	26	184	79% (n=24)	21%	15%	25%
Matched, unlobbied	179	115	88% (n=133)	12%	3%	25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13

5 lobbied · 76 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 13: 5 lobbied and 76 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	5	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	76	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13

56 lobbied · 128 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=5
Matched, unlobbied100% n=8

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied7%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13: 56 lobbied and 128 matched unlobbied applications in 32 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	56	—	100% (n=5)	0%	7%	0.16
Matched, unlobbied	128	—	100% (n=8)	0%	2%	0.01

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.