lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 19 144266 STE 10 OZ

41 Widmer St; 59 Widmer St; 126 John St; 132 John St; 142 John St; 259 Richmond St W; 261 Richmond St W; 263 Richmond St W; 267 Richmond St W

Status
Appeal Received
In progress
Submitted
24 April 2019
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
4
4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
41 Widmer St; 59 Widmer St; 126 John St; 132 John St; 142 John St; 259 Richmond St W; 261 Richmond St W; 263 Richmond St W; 267 Richmond St W
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
24 April 2019
Status
Appeal Received
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes
Size stated in the description
693 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development including two buildings, 37 and 42 storeys in height (131.0 metres and 145.2 metres, respectively, including mechanical penthouses). Proposed uses include two levels of retail, seven levels of office space, a daycare, the replacement of the existing movie theatre, an on-site publicly accessible privately owned open space and 693 residential units. The total gross floor area proposed is 80,334m2, consisting of 49,983m2 of residential floor area, and 30,351m2 of non-residential floor area. Two levels of below grade parking are proposed with 231 vehicle and 829 bicycle parking spaces. (Enacted as by-law 949-2022. Third-party appeal received.)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 4 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York4
Data table· 1 row
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort YorkMember of council4412 February 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied88—100% (n=7)0%10%0.03
Matched, unlobbied94—100% (n=7)0%5%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.