lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 19 137676 NNY 16 SA

10 Inn on The Park Dr; 1091 Leslie St; 1095 Leslie St.

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
9 April 2019
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
36
36 meetings · 17 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
10 Inn on The Park Dr; 1091 Leslie St; 1095 Leslie St.
Ward
Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Submitted
9 April 2019
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
251 units; 33,252 m² gross floor area
Related file
15 108593 NNY 25 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Tower A is a 33 storey (133m) residential building containing 251 dwelling units and a gross floor area of approximately 33,252 sqm. A total of 312 parking spaces are proposed to be located below grade. A total of 303 bicycle parking spaces are provided for visitor and resident use located on the main floor. The building provides a 5 storey podium with indoor and outdoor amenities located on the 5th floor.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 36 communications · 36 meetings · 17 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 26 Don Valley West4
  • Councillor Jaye Robinson3
  • Councillor McMahon2
  • Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina2
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
  • Ward 24 Willowdale2
  • Ward 25 Don Valley West2
  • Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth2
Data table· 17 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 26 Don Valley WestMember of council4429 March 2017
Councillor Jaye RobinsonCouncillor staff3328 March 2017
Councillor McMahonCouncillor staff2229 March 2017
Ward 19 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 25 Don Valley WestMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 29 Toronto-DanforthMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 33 Don Valley EastMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 34 Don Valley EastMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 37 Scarborough CentreMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 38 Scarborough CentreMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 5 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 6 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council2229 March 2017
Ward 9 York CentreMember of council2229 March 2017
Jon BurnsideMember of council2210 February 2023
Councillor Jaye RobisonCouncillor staff1128 March 2017

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

10 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16: 10 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied23Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.