Address · Ward 16 · Jon Burnside

1095 Leslie St.

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 36; 17 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; 2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 16 · Jon Burnside
Location: 43.72045, -79.34927
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 1101 LESLIE ST (6 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Deltera Inc.SM20027 · 1 January 201436

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 26 Don Valley West4
Councillor Jaye Robinson3
Councillor McMahon2
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina2
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina2
Ward 24 Willowdale2
Ward 25 Don Valley West2
Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth2

Data table· 17 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 26 Don Valley West	Member of council	4	4	29 March 2017
Councillor Jaye Robinson	Councillor staff	3	3	28 March 2017
Councillor McMahon	Councillor staff	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 24 Willowdale	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 25 Don Valley West	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 29 Toronto-Danforth	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 33 Don Valley East	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 34 Don Valley East	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 38 Scarborough Centre	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Ward 9 York Centre	Member of council	2	2	29 March 2017
Jon Burnside	Member of council	2	2	10 February 2023
Councillor Jaye Robison	Councillor staff	1	1	28 March 2017

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM20027	Deltera Inc.	1095 Leslie St.	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…	1 January 2014 – 31 December 2026	36

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 17 March 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 124291 NNY 16 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 9 April 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 137676 NNY 16 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 19 July 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 193617 NNY 25 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 January 2015Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 15 108578 NNY 25 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 26 January 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 108593 NNY 25 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
23 124291 NNY 16 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	17 March 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
19 137676 NNY 16 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	9 April 2019	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 193617 NNY 25 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	19 July 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 108578 NNY 25 SB Development application	Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)	26 January 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 108593 NNY 25 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	26 January 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1091 Leslie St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
19 137676 NNY 16 SA · submitted 9 April 2019 · Closed · from registration SM20027 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20027: Development Site at 1095 Leslie St. at Eglinton, Auberge on the Park Planning and Development Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 19 137676 NNY 16 SA at 1091 Leslie St: Tower A is a 33 storey (133m) residential building containing 251 dwelling units and a gross floor area of approximately 33,252 sqm. A total of 312 parking spaces are proposed to be located below grade. A total of 303 bicycle parking spaces are provided for visitor and resident use located on the m… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Site at 1095 Leslie St. at Eglinton, Auberge on the Park Planning and Development Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan
Matched fields
address
1095 LESLIE ST
application_address
1095 LESLIE ST
1087 Leslie St · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
15 108578 NNY 25 SB · submitted 26 January 2015 · Closed · from registration SM20027 (Deltera Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM20027: Development Site at 1095 Leslie St. at Eglinton, Auberge on the Park Planning and Development Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 15 108578 NNY 25 SB at 1087 Leslie St: The application proposes to rezone and subdivide approximately 2.07 hectares of land located on the east side of Leslie Street and north of Eglinton Avenue East. The proposal consists of three residential buildings with heights of 29, 39 and 45 storeys containing 1,180 residential units and a total… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Site at 1095 Leslie St. at Eglinton, Auberge on the Park Planning and Development Application, Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Site Plan
Matched fields
address
1095 LESLIE ST
application_address
1095 LESLIE ST

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

10 lobbied · 23 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16: 10 lobbied and 23 matched unlobbied applications in 8 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	23	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

4 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16: 4 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 16

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 16

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 16

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide