Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 18 272239 ESC 22 SB
20 Cowdray Crt; 40 Cowdray Crt; 50 Cowdray Crt; 70 Cowdray Crt; 80 Cowdray Crt; 100 Cowdray Crt
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 27 December 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 20 Cowdray Crt; 40 Cowdray Crt; 50 Cowdray Crt; 70 Cowdray Crt; 80 Cowdray Crt; 100 Cowdray Crt
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Submitted
- 27 December 2018
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Multi-phased, high density, mixed use development on 6 blocks of land on Cowdray Court. Includes dedication of lands for expansion of Collingwood Park and for future public road and road connections. Cross refence with zoning by-law amendment application 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Gemterra Developments Inc. · registration SM27272
Application to develop property at 20, 50, 70, 100 Cowdray Court in Scarborough
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27272: Application to develop property at 20, 50, 70, 100 Cowdray Court in Scarborough (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 272239 ESC 22 SB at 70 Cowdray Crt: Multi-phased, high density, mixed use development on 6 blocks of land on Cowdray Court. Includes dedication of lands for expansion of Collingwood Park and for future public road and road connections. Cross refence with zoning by-law amendment application 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop property at 20, 50, 70, 100 Cowdray Court in Scarborough
Matched fields
- address
- 100 COWDRAY CRT
- application_address
- 100 COWDRAY CRT
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Gemterra Developments Inc.SM24618 · 25 May 2017 · “100 Cowdray Court”
- Gemterra Developments Inc.SM24613 · 25 May 2017 · “50 Cowdray Ct”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.