Address · Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
100 Cowdray Crt
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
- Location
- 43.78094, -79.28653
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 40 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 29 May 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM27272 | Gemterra Developments Inc. | 100 Cowdray Court | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Plan of … | 3 January 2019 – 31 December 2020 | 0 |
| SM24618 | Gemterra Developments Inc. | 100 Cowdray Court | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 25 May 2017 – 14 June 2019 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 27 December 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 272231 ESC 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 December 2018Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 18 272239 ESC 22 SBUnder Review · In progress
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 27 December 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 272239 ESC 22 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 27 December 2018 | Under Review In progress |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
70 Cowdray Crt · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
18 272239 ESC 22 SB · submitted 27 December 2018 · Under Review · from registration SM27272 (Gemterra Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27272: Application to develop property at 20, 50, 70, 100 Cowdray Court in Scarborough (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 272239 ESC 22 SB at 70 Cowdray Crt: Multi-phased, high density, mixed use development on 6 blocks of land on Cowdray Court. Includes dedication of lands for expansion of Collingwood Park and for future public road and road connections. Cross refence with zoning by-law amendment application 18 272231 ESC 22 OZ. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Application to develop property at 20, 50, 70, 100 Cowdray Court in Scarborough
Matched fields
- address
- 100 COWDRAY CRT
- application_address
- 100 COWDRAY CRT
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22
6 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 6 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.