lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SA

117 Broadway Ave; 127 Broadway Ave

Ward 12 · Josh MatlowDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
12 October 2018
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
4
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
26
0 meetings · 20 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
117 Broadway Ave; 127 Broadway Ave
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
12 October 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
928 units
Related file
15 228738 STE 22 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control application for a 33 and 36 storey mixed-use building (928 dwelling units) at 117-127 Broadway Avenue.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

4 linked registrations · 26 communications · 0 meetings · 20 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Robinson, Ward 153
  • Councillor Ainslie, Ward 242
  • Councillor Bradford, Ward 192
  • Councillor Crawford, Ward 202
  • Councillor Thompson, Ward 212
  • Councillor Holyday, Ward 21
  • Councillor Pasternak, Ward 61
  • Councillor Perruzza, Ward 71
Data table· 20 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Robinson, Ward 15Councillor staff3016 September 2019
Councillor Ainslie, Ward 24Councillor staff2019 June 2019
Councillor Bradford, Ward 19Councillor staff2019 June 2019
Councillor Crawford, Ward 20Councillor staff2018 June 2019
Councillor Thompson, Ward 21Councillor staff2018 June 2019
Councillor Holyday, Ward 2Councillor staff1019 June 2019
Councillor Pasternak, Ward 6Councillor staff1018 June 2019
Councillor Perruzza, Ward 7Councillor staff1018 June 2019
Ward 19 Beaches-East YorkMember of council1019 June 2019
Ward 2 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1019 June 2019
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 21 Scarborough CentreMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 24 Scarborough-GuildwoodMember of council1019 June 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 3 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 6 York CentreMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 7 Humber River-Black CreekMember of council1018 June 2019
Ward 8 Eglinton-LawrenceMember of council1016 September 2019
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1018 June 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12

32 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied3%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12: 32 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied32—100% (n=4)0%3%0.00
Matched, unlobbied72—100% (n=6)0%0%0.05
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.