Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
117 Broadway Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.71057, -79.39270
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 20 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Robinson, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 16 September 2019 |
| Councillor Ainslie, Ward 24 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Councillor Bradford, Ward 19 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Councillor Crawford, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Councillor Thompson, Ward 21 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Councillor Holyday, Ward 2 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Councillor Pasternak, Ward 6 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Councillor Perruzza, Ward 7 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 19 Beaches-East York | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 21 Scarborough Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 19 June 2019 |
| Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge Park | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 6 York Centre | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
| Ward 8 Eglinton-Lawrence | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 16 September 2019 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 18 June 2019 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM28362 | Reserve Properties Limited | 117 Broadway Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 12 June 2019 – 14 December 2021 | 1 |
| SM27079 | Reserve Properties Limited | 117 Broadway Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 26 November 2018 – 8 July 2024 | 3 |
| SM27083 | Reserve Properties Limited | 117 Broadway Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 26 November 2018 – 26 March 2025 | 20 |
| SM27090 | Reserve Properties Limited | 117 Broadway Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 26 November 2018 – 14 December 2021 | 2 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 3 October 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0871/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 18 October 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 215671 STE 12 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 October 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A1140/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 12 October 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 25 September 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 228738 STE 22 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0871/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 3 October 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 23 215671 STE 12 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 18 October 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A1140/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 October 2022 | Closed Approved |
| 18 241493 STE 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 12 October 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 15 228738 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 25 September 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
117 Broadway Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 241493 STE 22 SA · submitted 12 October 2018 · Closed · from registration SM27079 (Reserve Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27079: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SA at 117 Broadway Ave: Site Plan Control application for a 33 and 36 storey mixed-use building (928 dwelling units) at 117-127 Broadway Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
117 Broadway Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 241493 STE 22 SA · submitted 12 October 2018 · Closed · from registration SM27083 (Reserve Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27083: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SA at 117 Broadway Ave: Site Plan Control application for a 33 and 36 storey mixed-use building (928 dwelling units) at 117-127 Broadway Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
117 Broadway Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 241493 STE 22 SA · submitted 12 October 2018 · Closed · from registration SM27090 (Reserve Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.77
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27090: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SA at 117 Broadway Ave: Site Plan Control application for a 33 and 36 storey mixed-use building (928 dwelling units) at 117-127 Broadway Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
117 Broadway Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
18 241493 STE 22 SA · submitted 12 October 2018 · Closed · from registration SM28362 (Reserve Properties Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM28362: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 18 241493 STE 22 SA at 117 Broadway Ave: Site Plan Control application for a 33 and 36 storey mixed-use building (928 dwelling units) at 117-127 Broadway Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Pertaining to development projects at 100, 110-120, and 117 Broadway Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
- application_address
- 117 BROADWAY AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 12
20 lobbied · 357 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 106 | 50% (n=12) | 50% | 35% | 86% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 357 | 145 | 90% (n=291) | 10% | 5% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 12
5 lobbied · 11 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 11 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.