lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 128310 STE 22 OZ

90 Eglinton Ave E; 110 Eglinton Ave E

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
12 March 2018
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
13
0 meetings · 11 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
90 Eglinton Ave E; 110 Eglinton Ave E
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
12 March 2018
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
456 units; 50,225 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 52-storey mixed-use building. The proposed height is 187 metre to the roof of the mechanical penthouse. The total proposed gross floor area is 50,225 square metres, which is comprised of 32,573 square metres of residential area (456 dwelling units), 13,167 square metres of office space, and 4,485 square metres of retail uses within the first two levels of the building. the applicant is proposing 229 parking spaces in a three level underground garage.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 13 communications · 0 meetings · 11 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Crawford, Ward 203
  • Councillor Ainslie, Ward 241
  • Councillor Holyday, Ward 21
  • Councillor Nunziata, Ward 51
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre1
  • Ward 20 Scarborough Southwest1
  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt1
  • Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood1
Data table· 11 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Crawford, Ward 20Councillor staff3015 April 2019
Councillor Ainslie, Ward 24Councillor staff1011 April 2019
Councillor Holyday, Ward 2Councillor staff1011 April 2019
Councillor Nunziata, Ward 5Councillor staff1012 April 2019
Ward 2 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1012 April 2019
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1015 April 2019
Ward 24 Scarborough-GuildwoodMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 3 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council1015 April 2019
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1015 April 2019

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied44—100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.