lobbyTO

Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow

90 Eglinton Ave E

Registrations naming this address
4
1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations
17
15 offices contacted
Applications at this address
2
2 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Location
43.70762, -79.39590
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

4

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Councillor Crawford, Ward 203
  • Councillor Ainslie, Ward 241
  • Councillor Brad Bradford W191
  • Councillor Holyday, Ward 21
  • Councillor Michael Ford W11
  • Councillor Michael Thompson W211
  • Councillor Nunziata, Ward 51
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre1
Data table· 15 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Crawford, Ward 20Councillor staff3015 April 2019
Councillor Ainslie, Ward 24Councillor staff1011 April 2019
Councillor Brad Bradford W19Councillor staff1010 April 2019
Councillor Holyday, Ward 2Councillor staff1011 April 2019
Councillor Michael Ford W1Councillor staff1010 April 2019
Councillor Michael Thompson W21Councillor staff1010 April 2019
Councillor Nunziata, Ward 5Councillor staff1012 April 2019
Ward 2 Etobicoke CentreMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 20 Scarborough SouthwestMember of council1012 April 2019
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council1015 April 2019
Ward 24 Scarborough-GuildwoodMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 25 Scarborough-Rouge ParkMember of council1011 April 2019
Ward 3 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council1015 April 2019
Ward 6 York CentreMember of council1010 April 2019
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council1015 April 2019
All registrations· 4 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM28002Madison Group90 Eglinton Avenue EastPlanning and Development, Combined Application10 April 2019 – 31 January 20214
SM28004Madison Group90 Eglinton Avenue EastPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan10 April 2019 – 28 June 202010
SM28005Madison Group90 Eglinton Avenue EastPlanning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan10 April 2019 – 28 June 20203
SM22110Madison Group90 Eglinton Ave East.Building Permits; Planning and Development, Combined Application; Real Estate / Property (City-owne…12 August 2015 – 31 December 20170

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

2
Data table· 2 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
21 213515 STE 12 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)16 September 2021Under Review
In progress
18 128310 STE 22 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)12 March 2018Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 12

1 lobbied · 12 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 12: 1 lobbied and 12 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied12Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied44—100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.