Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 18 119622 STE 28 OZ

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 February 2018; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 25 Ontario St; 280 King St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 21 February 2018
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 11 327900 STE 28 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Application to lift the holding provision on By-laws 1474-2017 and 1475-2017

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC
SM33649 · 12 September 2022 · “280 King Street East”
ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC
SM33650 · 12 September 2022 · “280 King Street East”
ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC
SM33651 · 12 September 2022 · “280 King Street East”
First Gulf
SM30124 · 27 May 2020 · “25 Ontario Street”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM25630 · 7 February 2018 · “280 King St. East”
First Gulf Ontario Street Corporation
SM22382 · 26 October 2015 · “25 Ontario Street”
Great Gulf Group of Companies
SM20094 · 21 February 2014 · “25 Ontario Street”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM18926 · 11 February 2013 · “25 Ontario Street”
SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.
SM18783 · 13 December 2012 · “25 Ontario Street”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.