Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
25 Ontario St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65241, -79.36609
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
5These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 11 | 6 | 27 February 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 | Councillor staff | 8 | 0 | 26 June 2014 |
| Office of Councillor McConnell | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 27 October 2015 |
| Downtown Planning Section | City staff | 1 | 0 | 13 December 2012 |
| Office of Councillor McConnell, Ward 28 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 27 October 2015 |
All registrations· 5 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30124 | First Gulf | 25 Ontario Street | Planning and Development | 27 May 2020 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM22382 | First Gulf Ontario Street Corporation | 25 Ontario Street | Planning and Development, Heritage; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 26 October 2015 – 26 April 2019 | 2 |
| SM20094 | Great Gulf Group of Companies | 25 Ontario Street | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 21 February 2014 – 28 May 2020 | 7 |
| SM18926 | SAS Institute (Canada) Inc. | 25 Ontario Street | Planning and Development, Planning Policy / Study; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-… | 11 February 2013 – 31 March 2015 | 0 |
| SM18783 | SAS Institute (Canada) Inc. | 25 Ontario Street | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan; Planning and Development Application, Minor Varian… | 13 December 2012 – 31 December 2019 | 14 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 21 February 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 119622 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 December 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 327900 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 December 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 327912 STE 28 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 119622 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 February 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 327900 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 327912 STE 28 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
25 Ontario St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 327900 STE 28 OZ · submitted 19 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18926 (SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18926: Review and Input regarding application for rezoning of 25 Ontario Street (adjacent to SAS's 280 King street Property) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 327900 STE 28 OZ at 25 Ontario St: Revised rezoning application to permit a 23-storey office building containing 41435 square metres of office space, 341 square metres of retail space, 155 vehicular parking spaces within a 5-level underground garage, and 183 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Review and Input regarding application for rezoning of 25 Ontario Street (adjacent to SAS's 280 King street Property)
Matched fields
- address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
- application_address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
25 Ontario St · Site Plan Approval (SA)
11 327912 STE 28 SA · submitted 19 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18783 (SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM18783: 25 Ontario Street, Site Plan & Re-development (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 327912 STE 28 SA at 25 Ontario St: Revised Site Plan Application for the approved rezoning proposal for a 23-storey office building containing 41,089 square metres of office space, 341 square metres of retail space, 155 vehicular parking spaces and 183 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 25 Ontario Street, Site Plan & Re-development
Matched fields
- address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
- application_address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.