Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
280 King St E
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65202, -79.36577
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
4These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 7 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 8 | 0 | 20 October 2022 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 15 March 2018 |
| Office of Councillor Lucy Troisi | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 1 March 2018 |
| Office of The Mayor | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 7 October 2022 |
| Economic Development & Culture | City staff | 1 | 0 | 19 September 2022 |
| Mayor | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 1 March 2018 |
| Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 1 March 2018 |
All registrations· 4 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM33649 | ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC | 280 King Street East | Economic Development; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 12 September 2022 – 23 November 2022 | 9 |
| SM33650 | ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC | 280 King Street East | Economic Development; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 12 September 2022 – 23 November 2022 | 1 |
| SM33651 | ARE-CANADA NO. 5 HOLDINGS, ULC | 280 King Street East | Economic Development; Planning and Development Application, Minor Variance | 12 September 2022 – 23 November 2022 | 2 |
| SM25630 | SAS Institute (Canada) Inc. | 280 King St. East | Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 7 February 2018 – 31 December 2024 | 8 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
5- Submitted 14 June 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0702/22TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 August 2018Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0801/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 20 August 2018Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0082/18TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 21 February 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 119622 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 December 2011Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 11 327900 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 5 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| A0702/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 14 June 2022 | Closed Approved |
| A0801/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 20 August 2018 | Closed Approved |
| B0082/18TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 20 August 2018 | Closed Approved |
| 18 119622 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 21 February 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 327900 STE 28 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 December 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
25 Ontario St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
11 327900 STE 28 OZ · submitted 19 December 2011 · Closed · from registration SM18926 (SAS Institute (Canada) Inc.)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM18926: Review and Input regarding application for rezoning of 25 Ontario Street (adjacent to SAS's 280 King street Property) (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 11 327900 STE 28 OZ at 25 Ontario St: Revised rezoning application to permit a 23-storey office building containing 41435 square metres of office space, 341 square metres of retail space, 155 vehicular parking spaces within a 5-level underground garage, and 183 bicycle parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Review and Input regarding application for rezoning of 25 Ontario Street (adjacent to SAS's 280 King street Property)
Matched fields
- address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
- application_address
- 25 ONTARIO ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 13
5 lobbied · 76 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 76 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.