Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZ

2706 Dundas St W; 2708 Dundas St W; 2710 Dundas St W; 2720 Dundas St W; 2722 Dundas St W; 2726 Dundas St W

Ward 4 · Gord PerksDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 2 August 2017; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2706 Dundas St W; 2708 Dundas St W; 2710 Dundas St W; 2720 Dundas St W; 2722 Dundas St W; 2726 Dundas St W
Ward: Ward 4 · Gord Perks
Submitted: 2 August 2017
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 151 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 9-storey mixed-use building: 151 dwelling units, 63 parking spaces,541 sq.m. non-res GFA, 12839 sq. m. res GFA.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Globizen Development inc · registration SM25743
2706-2730 Dundas Street West rezoning application. Discussion of height for new condo.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25743: 2706-2730 Dundas Street West rezoning application. Discussion of height for new condo. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZ at 2720 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 9-storey mixed-use building: 151 dwelling units, 63 parking spaces,541 sq.m. non-res GFA, 12839 sq. m. res GFA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2706-2730 Dundas Street West rezoning application. Discussion of height for new condo.
Matched fields
address
2706-2730 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
2706 DUNDAS ST W
Slate Asset Management LP · registration SM24605
Zoning by-law and official plan amendments for a new mid-rise residential condominium located at 2706-2730 Dundas Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24605: Zoning by-law and official plan amendments for a new mid-rise residential condominium located at 2706-2730 Dundas Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZ at 2720 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 9-storey mixed-use building: 151 dwelling units, 63 parking spaces,541 sq.m. non-res GFA, 12839 sq. m. res GFA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning by-law and official plan amendments for a new mid-rise residential condominium located at 2706-2730 Dundas Street West
Matched fields
address
2706-2730 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
2706 DUNDAS ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park2

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park	Member of council	2	2	7 March 2018

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4

12 lobbied · 20 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4: 12 lobbied and 20 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	20	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.