Address · Ward 4 · Gord Perks
2722 Dundas St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 4 · Gord Perks
- Location
- 43.66513, -79.45991
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 21 November 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 259176 STE 14 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 August 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18 259176 STE 14 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 21 November 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 210219 STE 14 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 August 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2720 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 210219 STE 14 OZ · submitted 2 August 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24605 (Slate Asset Management LP)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24605: Zoning by-law and official plan amendments for a new mid-rise residential condominium located at 2706-2730 Dundas Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZ at 2720 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 9-storey mixed-use building: 151 dwelling units, 63 parking spaces,541 sq.m. non-res GFA, 12839 sq. m. res GFA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning by-law and official plan amendments for a new mid-rise residential condominium located at 2706-2730 Dundas Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 2706-2730 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 2706 DUNDAS ST W
2720 Dundas St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 210219 STE 14 OZ · submitted 2 August 2017 · Closed · from registration SM25743 (Globizen Development inc)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25743: 2706-2730 Dundas Street West rezoning application. Discussion of height for new condo. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 210219 STE 14 OZ at 2720 Dundas St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to facilitate redevelopment of the site with a 9-storey mixed-use building: 151 dwelling units, 63 parking spaces,541 sq.m. non-res GFA, 12839 sq. m. res GFA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2706-2730 Dundas Street West rezoning application. Discussion of height for new condo.
Matched fields
- address
- 2706-2730 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 2706 DUNDAS ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 4
17 lobbied · 33 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 33 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 4
12 lobbied · 20 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 20 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.