Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ
400 King St W; 420 King Street West
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 June 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 400 King St W; 420 King Street West
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 30 June 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 612 units; 42,066 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 square metres.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
400 King St W Inc · registration SM26944
to seek approval from the City of Toronto for the Official Plan and Rezoning of 400 King St W to allow a mixed use development
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26944: to seek approval from the City of Toronto for the Official Plan and Rezoning of 400 King St W to allow a mixed use development (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ at 400 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 squar… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: to seek approval from the City of Toronto for the Official Plan and Rezoning of 400 King St W to allow a mixed use development
Matched fields
- address
- 400 KING ST W
- application_address
- 400 KING ST W
Plazacorp Investments Limited · registration SM24555
Re-zoning application for 400-420 King Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24555: Re-zoning application for 400-420 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ at 400 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 squar… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-zoning application for 400-420 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 400-420 KING ST W
- application_address
- 400 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 20 communications · 3 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York | Member of council | 16 | 3 | 19 June 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 28 February 2019 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 9 November 2018 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 7 November 2018 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Charlotte King Residences Corp.SM24475 · 5 May 2017 · “400 King St W”
- Plazacorp Investments LimitedSM24472 · 4 May 2017 · “400 King Street West”
- Timothy''s World CoffeeSM11633 · 21 April 2008 · “420 King Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.