lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ

400 King St W; 420 King Street West

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
30 June 2017
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
20
3 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
400 King St W; 420 King Street West
Ward
Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
Submitted
30 June 2017
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
612 units; 42,066 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 square metres.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 20 communications · 3 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Ward 10 Spadina-Fort York16
  • Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 102
  • Office of Councillor Cressy1
  • Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina1
Data table· 4 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Ward 10 Spadina-Fort YorkMember of council16319 June 2020
Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 10Councillor staff2028 February 2019
Office of Councillor CressyCouncillor staff109 November 2018
Ward 20 Trinity-SpadinaMember of council107 November 2018

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10

88 lobbied · 94 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=7

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied10%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10: 88 lobbied and 94 matched unlobbied applications in 38 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied88—100% (n=7)0%10%0.03
Matched, unlobbied94—100% (n=7)0%5%0.01
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.