Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
420 King Street West
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64529, -79.39441
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 415 KING ST W (5 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM11633 | Timothy''s World Coffee | 420 King Street West | Licences | 21 April 2008 – 30 June 2008 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 8 November 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 235464 STE 10 CDDraft Plan Approved · Approved
- Submitted 15 November 2019Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 19 249738 STE 10 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 235464 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 8 November 2021 | Draft Plan Approved Approved |
| 19 249738 STE 10 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 November 2019 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 190839 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
400 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 190839 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM24555 (Plazacorp Investments Limited)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24555: Re-zoning application for 400-420 King Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ at 400 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 squar… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Re-zoning application for 400-420 King Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 400-420 KING ST W
- application_address
- 400 KING ST W
400 King St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 190839 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2017 · Closed · from registration SM26944 (400 King St W Inc)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26944: to seek approval from the City of Toronto for the Official Plan and Rezoning of 400 King St W to allow a mixed use development (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 190839 STE 20 OZ at 400 King St W: Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (156.9 metres, including mechanical penthouse), with a total of 612 residential units and approximately 3419 square metres of ground floor retail space and second floor office space. The total proposed gross floor area is 42,066 squar… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: to seek approval from the City of Toronto for the Official Plan and Rezoning of 400 King St W to allow a mixed use development
Matched fields
- address
- 400 KING ST W
- application_address
- 400 KING ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | 1,881 | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 11% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.