lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 17 173706 STE 22 OZ

30 Merton St

Status
OMB Approved
Approved
Submitted
5 June 2017
Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
14
9 meetings · 4 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
30 Merton St
Ward
Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
Submitted
5 June 2017
Status
OMB Approved
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
Yes

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This development application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a residential rental building at 37 storeys in height including a 5-storey base building. The proposed building would contain 352 apartment units, 126 residential parking spaces on levels 3 through 5, and 207 commercial parking spaces in a 3-level underground commercial parking garage and on the ground floor.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 14 communications · 9 meetings · 4 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 5 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Josh MatlowCouncillor staff6525 May 2026
Josh MatlowMember of council302 April 2025
Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul'sMember of council2220 May 2022
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council213 April 2018
Ward 22 St. Paul'sMember of council1131 March 2017

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12

44 lobbied · 60 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=9
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=9

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied14%
  • Matched, unlobbied10%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12: 44 lobbied and 60 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied44—100% (n=9)0%14%0.02
Matched, unlobbied60—100% (n=9)0%10%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.