Address · Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
30 Merton St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Location
- 43.69651, -79.39513
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 6 | 5 | 25 May 2026 |
| Ward 12 Toronto-St. Paul's | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 20 May 2022 |
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 3 | 0 | 2 April 2025 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 3 April 2018 |
| Councillor Josh Matlow Ward 12 | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 20 February 2019 |
| Ward 22 St. Paul's | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 31 March 2017 |
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM24206 | QuadReal Real Property Group Limited Partnership | 30 Merton St. | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 16 March 2017 – 1 December 2021 | 2 |
| SM24078 | QuadReal Real Property Group Limited Partnership | 30 Merton Street. | By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development … | 23 February 2017 – 31 December 2026 | 14 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 23 July 2026Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0049/26TEYHearing Scheduled · In progress
- Submitted 29 January 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 110665 STE 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 29 October 2018Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 18 249392 STE 22 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 5 June 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 173706 STE 22 OZOMB Approved · Approved
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0049/26TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 23 July 2026 | Hearing Scheduled In progress |
| 26 110665 STE 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 January 2026 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 249392 STE 22 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 29 October 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 173706 STE 22 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 5 June 2017 | OMB Approved Approved |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
30 Merton St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 173706 STE 22 OZ · submitted 5 June 2017 · OMB Approved · from registration SM24078 (QuadReal Real Property Group Limited Partnership)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24078: Lobbying for rezoning and official plan amendments for the following project: 30 Merton Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 173706 STE 22 OZ at 30 Merton St: This development application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a residential rental building at 37 storeys in height including a 5-storey base building. The proposed building would contain 352 apartment units, 126 residential parking spaces on levels 3 through 5, and 2… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying for rezoning and official plan amendments for the following project: 30 Merton Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 30 MERTON ST
- application_address
- 30 MERTON ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 12
32 lobbied · 72 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 32 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 3% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | 511 | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | 1,925 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | 1,799 | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.