Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 17 122730 WET 17 SA
1779 St Clair Ave W; 1791 St Clair Ave W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 1 March 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1779 St Clair Ave W; 1791 St Clair Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 1 March 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application for proposed 12-storey mixed use development containing
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Graywood Developments Ltd. · registration SM22633
Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22633: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 122730 WET 17 SA at 1779 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan Control application for proposed 12-storey mixed use development containing (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 1785&1791 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 1791 ST CLAIR AVE W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 13 communications · 8 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 17 Davenport | Member of council | 13 | 8 | 19 December 2017 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Graywood Developments Ltd.SM23837 · 19 December 2016 · “1779 St Clair Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.