1779 St Clair Ave W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 17; 2 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 5; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Location: 43.67364, -79.46144
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Graywood Developments Ltd.SM23837 · 19 December 201617

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 17 Davenport13
Ward 9 Davenport4

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 17 Davenport	Member of council	13	9	20 March 2018
Ward 9 Davenport	Member of council	4	4	3 October 2019

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM23837	Graywood Developments Ltd.	1779 St Clair Avenue West	Planning and Development, Combined Application	19 December 2016 – 31 December 2026	17

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 15 March 2023Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 23 123563 STE 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 7 July 2022Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0790/22TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 9 September 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 210309 STE 09 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 28 August 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0955/19TEYClosed · Approved
Submitted 1 March 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 122730 WET 17 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 5 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
23 123563 STE 09 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	15 March 2023	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0790/22TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	7 July 2022	Closed Approved
21 210309 STE 09 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	9 September 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0955/19TEY Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	28 August 2019	Closed Approved
17 122730 WET 17 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	1 March 2017	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

1779 St Clair Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
17 122730 WET 17 SA · submitted 1 March 2017 · Closed · from registration SM22633 (Graywood Developments Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22633: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 122730 WET 17 SA at 1779 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan Control application for proposed 12-storey mixed use development containing (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assembly to make a larger parcel, 1771, 1779-1785 & 1791 St. Clair Avenue West, 367 & 375 Osler Street, City of Toronto
Matched fields
address
1785&1791 ST CLAIR AVE W
application_address
1791 ST CLAIR AVE W

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 4 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

27 lobbied · 333 matched

Median days

Lobbied169
Matched, unlobbied134

Approval rate

Lobbied67% n=27
Matched, unlobbied95% n=279

Refusal rate

Lobbied33%
Matched, unlobbied5%

Appeal rate

Lobbied26%
Matched, unlobbied6%

Objection rate

Lobbied29%
Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9: 27 lobbied and 333 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	27	169	67% (n=27)	33%	26%	29%
Matched, unlobbied	333	134	95% (n=279)	5%	6%	30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

20 lobbied · 21 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=4

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9: 20 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	20	—	100% (n=4)	0%	0%	0.05
Matched, unlobbied	21	—	100% (n=4)	0%	0%	0.10

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 9

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide