Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SA

3390 Bayview Ave; 3392 Bayview Ave; 3394 Bayview Ave; 3396 Bayview Ave; 3398 Bayview Ave

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 2 December 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 0; 0 meetings · 0 offices

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 3390 Bayview Ave; 3392 Bayview Ave; 3394 Bayview Ave; 3396 Bayview Ave; 3398 Bayview Ave
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 2 December 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 24 units
Related file: 16 114795 NNY 24 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This application proposes 24 back-to-back townhouse units in 2 blocks with 53 underground parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Andrew Unger Professional Corporation · registration SM22985
To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22985: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SA at 3390 Bayview Ave: This application proposes 24 back-to-back townhouse units in 2 blocks with 53 underground parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
address
3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
application_address
3390 BAYVIEW AVE
Andrew Unger Professional Corporation · registration SM22986
To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22986: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SA at 3390 Bayview Ave: This application proposes 24 back-to-back townhouse units in 2 blocks with 53 underground parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
address
3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
application_address
3390 BAYVIEW AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

No communications recorded.

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Goldberg Group2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18

18 lobbied · 125 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18: 18 lobbied and 125 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	18	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	125	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.