Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
3396 Bayview Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.79712, -79.39515
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 25 February 2026Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 26 121464 NNY 18 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 6 November 2024Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 24 235666 NNY 18 OZAppeal Received · In progress
- Submitted 2 December 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 9 February 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 114795 NNY 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26 121464 NNY 18 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 25 February 2026 | Under Review In progress |
| 24 235666 NNY 18 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 November 2024 | Appeal Received In progress |
| 16 259550 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 2 December 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 114795 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 9 February 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
3390 Bayview Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 259550 NNY 24 SA · submitted 2 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22985 (Andrew Unger Professional Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22985: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SA at 3390 Bayview Ave: This application proposes 24 back-to-back townhouse units in 2 blocks with 53 underground parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 3390 BAYVIEW AVE
3390 Bayview Ave · Site Plan Approval (SA)
16 259550 NNY 24 SA · submitted 2 December 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22986 (Andrew Unger Professional Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22986: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 259550 NNY 24 SA at 3390 Bayview Ave: This application proposes 24 back-to-back townhouse units in 2 blocks with 53 underground parking spaces. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 3390 BAYVIEW AVE
3390 Bayview Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 114795 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 9 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22985 (Andrew Unger Professional Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22985: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 114795 NNY 24 OZ at 3390 Bayview Ave: The application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes 24 4-storey, back-to-back townhouses arranged in 2 blocks with 50 underground parking spaces, for the property at 3390, 3392, 3394, 3396, 3398 Bayview Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 3390 BAYVIEW AVE
3390 Bayview Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 114795 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 9 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22986 (Andrew Unger Professional Corporation)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22986: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 114795 NNY 24 OZ at 3390 Bayview Ave: The application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes 24 4-storey, back-to-back townhouses arranged in 2 blocks with 50 underground parking spaces, for the property at 3390, 3392, 3394, 3396, 3398 Bayview Avenue. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To provide a description of the development proposal at 3390-3398 Bayview Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 3390-3398 BAYVIEW AVE
- application_address
- 3390 BAYVIEW AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.