Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 230579 ESC 35 OZ
1 Eglinton Sq; 14 Engelhart Cres; 18 Engelhart Cres; 19 Engelhart Cres; 22 Engelhart Cres; 23 Engelhart Cres; 26 Engelhart Cres; 64 Harris Park Dr; 68 Harris Park Dr; 70 Eglinton Sq; 1431 Victoria Park Ave; 1437 Victoria Park Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 29 September 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1 Eglinton Sq; 14 Engelhart Cres; 18 Engelhart Cres; 19 Engelhart Cres; 22 Engelhart Cres; 23 Engelhart Cres; 26 Engelhart Cres; 64 Harris Park Dr; 68 Harris Park Dr; 70 Eglinton Sq; 1431 Victoria Park Ave; 1437 Victoria Park Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 29 September 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development on the lands at 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, and 14,18, 22, and 26 Engelhart Crescent. The development would consist of building heights that range from eight (8) to 46 storeys, public parkland and new public streets, including the O'Connor Drive Reconfiguration.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Kingsett Capital · registration SM24826
1 Eglinton Square
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24826: 1 Eglinton Square (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 230579 ESC 35 OZ at 22 Engelhart Cres: Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development on the lands at 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, and 14,18, 22, and 26 Engelhart Crescent. The development would consist of building heights that range from eight (8) to 46 storeys, public parkland and ne… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Square
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Kingsett CapitalSM29236 · 25 November 2019 · “26 Engelhart Crescent”
- Kingsett CapitalSM25575 · 24 January 2018 · “26 Engelhart Crescent”
- Kingsett CapitalSM22695 · 22 January 2016 · “1 Eglinton Square”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.