Address · Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
64 Harris Park Dr
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Location
- 43.72219, -79.29846
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 7 September 2021Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 21 208865 ESC 20 SBAppeal Received · In progress
- Submitted 3 October 2017Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 17 242390 ESC 35 OZOMB Approved · Approved
- Submitted 29 September 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 230579 ESC 35 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 208865 ESC 20 SB Development application | Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB) | 7 September 2021 | Appeal Received In progress |
| 17 242390 ESC 35 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 3 October 2017 | OMB Approved Approved |
| 16 230579 ESC 35 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 29 September 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1431 Victoria Park Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 242390 ESC 35 OZ · submitted 3 October 2017 · OMB Approved · from registration SM25575 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25575: 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1427 Victoria Park Avenue, and 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 242390 ESC 35 OZ at 1431 Victoria Park Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application for the lands at 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 & 1437 Victoria Park Ave, 14, 18, 22 and 26 Engelhart Cres within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan Area to permit a mixed-use development. The application proposes six (6) tall buildings with building heights that range f… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1427 Victoria Park Avenue, and 14, 18, 19, 22, 23, and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 1-70 EGLINTON SQ
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
1431 Victoria Park Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
17 242390 ESC 35 OZ · submitted 3 October 2017 · OMB Approved · from registration SM29236 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM29236: 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1427 Victoria Park Avenue and 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 17 242390 ESC 35 OZ at 1431 Victoria Park Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment application for the lands at 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 & 1437 Victoria Park Ave, 14, 18, 22 and 26 Engelhart Cres within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan Area to permit a mixed-use development. The application proposes six (6) tall buildings with building heights that range f… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1427 Victoria Park Avenue and 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive
Matched fields
- address
- 1-70 EGLINTON SQ
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
22 Engelhart Cres · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 230579 ESC 35 OZ · submitted 29 September 2016 · Closed · from registration SM24826 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24826: 1 Eglinton Square (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 230579 ESC 35 OZ at 22 Engelhart Cres: Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development on the lands at 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, and 14,18, 22, and 26 Engelhart Crescent. The development would consist of building heights that range from eight (8) to 46 storeys, public parkland and ne… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1 Eglinton Square
Matched fields
- address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
- application_address
- 1 EGLINTON SQ
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 20
1 lobbied · 1 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 1 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 20
13 lobbied · 19 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.