lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 209876 ESC 44 OZ

0 Conlins Rd; 130 Old Kingston Rd; 200 Old Kingston Rd; 755 Morningside Ave; 875 Morningside Ave; 1036 Military Trl; 1048 Military Trl; 1049 Military Trl; 1050 Military Trl; 1052 Military Trl; 1235 Military Trl; 1255 Military Trl; 1265 Military Trl; 1275 Military Trl; 3290 Ellesmere Rd; 3295 Ellesmere Rd; 3296 Ellesmere Rd; 3302 Ellesmere Rd; 3316 Ellesmere Rd; 3320 Ellesmere Rd; 3336 Ellesmere Rd; 3340 Ellesmere Rd

Ward 25 · Neethan ShanDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page
Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
19 August 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
0 Conlins Rd; 130 Old Kingston Rd; 200 Old Kingston Rd; 755 Morningside Ave; 875 Morningside Ave; 1036 Military Trl; 1048 Military Trl; 1049 Military Trl; 1050 Military Trl; 1052 Military Trl; 1235 Military Trl; 1255 Military Trl; 1265 Military Trl; 1275 Military Trl; 3290 Ellesmere Rd; 3295 Ellesmere Rd; 3296 Ellesmere Rd; 3302 Ellesmere Rd; 3316 Ellesmere Rd; 3320 Ellesmere Rd; 3336 Ellesmere Rd; 3340 Ellesmere Rd
Ward
Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
Submitted
19 August 2016
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan Amendment application to adopt a Secondary Plan for the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25

3 lobbied · 4 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25: 3 lobbied and 4 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied3Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied4Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.