Address · Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
1265 Military Trl
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
- Location
- 43.78389, -79.18629
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
0These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
None.
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
8- Submitted 19 August 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 209876 ESC 44 OZUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 23 January 2015Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 15 107746 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 December 2014Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 14 266131 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 20 March 2014Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 14 131315 ESC 44 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 31 October 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 259340 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 15 August 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 256894 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 8 March 2011Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 11 140604 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 19 March 2008Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 08 120743 ESC 44 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 8 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 209876 ESC 44 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 19 August 2016 | Under Review In progress |
| 15 107746 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 January 2015 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 266131 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 December 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 14 131315 ESC 44 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 20 March 2014 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 259340 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 31 October 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 256894 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 August 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 11 140604 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 8 March 2011 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 08 120743 ESC 44 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 19 March 2008 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
No published links to development or Committee of Adjustment applications.
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 25
3 lobbied · 4 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 3 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 25
4 lobbied · 18 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.