Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 186017 NNY 23 OZ
21 Franklin Ave; 23 Franklin Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 6 July 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 21 Franklin Ave; 23 Franklin Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 6 July 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
This application proposes the creation of 6 residential lots with 3-storey single detached dwellings from the consolidation of 2 residential lots. The existing single detached dwellings would be demolished.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
VERIZON HOMES COMPANY LTD · registration SM22872
21 and 23 Franklin Ave
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22872: 21 and 23 Franklin Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 186017 NNY 23 OZ at 21 Franklin Ave: This application proposes the creation of 6 residential lots with 3-storey single detached dwellings from the consolidation of 2 residential lots. The existing single detached dwellings would be demolished. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 21 and 23 Franklin Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 23 FRANKLIN AVE
- application_address
- 23 FRANKLIN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 1940844 Ontario Inc.SM22726 · 1 January 2016 · “23 Franklin Avenue”
- Bijan MoiniSM22598 · 23 December 2015 · “23 Franklin Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.