Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
23 Franklin Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.75603, -79.41088
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor John Filion, Ward 23 | Councillor staff | 14 | 0 | 17 January 2017 |
| Ward 23 Willowdale | Member of council | 4 | 2 | 6 January 2017 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM22872 | VERIZON HOMES COMPANY LTD | 23 Franklin Ave | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Site Pla… | 7 March 2016 – 7 March 2017 | 0 |
| SM22726 | 1940844 Ontario Inc. | 23 Franklin Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 1 January 2016 – 16 November 2017 | 9 |
| SM22598 | Bijan Moini | 23 Franklin Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B… | 23 December 2015 – 4 April 2023 | 9 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 21 July 2016Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0047/16NYClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 6 July 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 186017 NNY 23 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0047/16NY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 21 July 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 186017 NNY 23 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 6 July 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
21 Franklin Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 186017 NNY 23 OZ · submitted 6 July 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22872 (VERIZON HOMES COMPANY LTD)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22872: 21 and 23 Franklin Ave (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 186017 NNY 23 OZ at 21 Franklin Ave: This application proposes the creation of 6 residential lots with 3-storey single detached dwellings from the consolidation of 2 residential lots. The existing single detached dwellings would be demolished. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 21 and 23 Franklin Ave
Matched fields
- address
- 23 FRANKLIN AVE
- application_address
- 23 FRANKLIN AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.