Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZ
102 Peter St; 108 Peter St; 114 Peter St; 118 Peter St; 350 Adelaide St W; 352 Adelaide St W; 354 Adelaide St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 June 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 102 Peter St; 108 Peter St; 114 Peter St; 118 Peter St; 350 Adelaide St W; 352 Adelaide St W; 354 Adelaide St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 30 June 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 899 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning by-law amendment application for two towers: a 48-storey tower (156.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a 40-storey tower (130.15 metres including mechanical penthouse) containing 899 residential units on a 6 storey podium including two levels of retail space, and 225 underground parking spaces. The application proposes to demolish proposed heritage properties at 350 and 352 Adelaide Street West, and 118 Peter Street.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Graywood Developments Ltd. · registration SM25219
Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25219: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZ at 102 Peter St: Zoning by-law amendment application for two towers: a 48-storey tower (156.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a 40-storey tower (130.15 metres including mechanical penthouse) containing 899 residential units on a 6 storey podium including two levels of retail space, and 225 underground p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street
Matched fields
- address
- 102-118 PETER ST
- application_address
- 102 PETER ST
Telplar Limited Partnership · registration SM25013
Zoning By-law Amendment application for 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street West, Toronto
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25013: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZ at 102 Peter St: Zoning by-law amendment application for two towers: a 48-storey tower (156.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a 40-storey tower (130.15 metres including mechanical penthouse) containing 899 residential units on a 6 storey podium including two levels of retail space, and 225 underground p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 102-118 PETER ST
- application_address
- 102 PETER ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 8 communications · 1 meeting · 5 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Cressy, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 7 November 2017 |
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 25 October 2017 |
| City legal | City staff | 1 | 0 | 16 October 2017 |
| Planning | City staff | 1 | 0 | 10 October 2017 |
| Office of Councillor Cressy, Ward 20 | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 11 September 2017 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Seagate Investments LimitedSM17764 · 31 January 2012 · “118 Peter Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.