Address · Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
118 Peter St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Location
- 43.64795, -79.39331
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
1These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 9 February 2012 |
All registrations· 1 row
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM17764 | Seagate Investments Limited | 118 Peter Street | Building Permits; Building Inspection | 31 January 2012 – 28 June 2012 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 2 November 2022Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 22 224899 STE 10 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 27 December 2017Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 17 279366 STE 20 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 30 June 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 224899 STE 10 CD Development application | Draft Plan of Condominium (CD) | 2 November 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 17 279366 STE 20 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 27 December 2017 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 16 183537 STE 20 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 30 June 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
102 Peter St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 183537 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25013 (Telplar Limited Partnership)
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM25013: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZ at 102 Peter St: Zoning by-law amendment application for two towers: a 48-storey tower (156.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a 40-storey tower (130.15 metres including mechanical penthouse) containing 899 residential units on a 6 storey podium including two levels of retail space, and 225 underground p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning By-law Amendment application for 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 102-118 PETER ST
- application_address
- 102 PETER ST
102 Peter St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 183537 STE 20 OZ · submitted 30 June 2016 · Closed · from registration SM25219 (Graywood Developments Ltd.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM25219: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 183537 STE 20 OZ at 102 Peter St: Zoning by-law amendment application for two towers: a 48-storey tower (156.25 metres including mechanical penthouse) and a 40-storey tower (130.15 metres including mechanical penthouse) containing 899 residential units on a 6 storey podium including two levels of retail space, and 225 underground p… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Matters relating to planning approvals for the lands municipally known as 102-118 Peter Street and 350-354 Adelaide Street
Matched fields
- address
- 102-118 PETER ST
- application_address
- 102 PETER ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), Ward 10
4 lobbied · 25 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 4 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 25 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.