Development application · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
Development application 16 133595 WET 02 SB
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 30 March 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
- Addresses
- 50 Humberwood Boulevard.
- Ward
- Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
- Submitted
- 30 March 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 15 192495 WET 02 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 10 blocks to accomodate the following: Blocks 1 - 6 (freehold townhouses); Block 7 (back-to-back townhouses); Block 8 (open space area); Block 9 (natural heritage area); and Block 10 (street widening). See Folder 192495 WET 02 OZ and 133600 WET 02 SA for related rezoning and site plan applications.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Tribute Communities · registration SM26233
Assisting with the development of 50 Humberwood Boulevard.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26233: Assisting with the development of 50 Humberwood Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 133595 WET 02 SB at 50 Humberwood Blvd: Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 10 blocks to accomodate the following: Blocks 1 - 6 (freehold townhouses); Block 7 (back-to-back townhouses); Block 8 (open space area); Block 9 (natural heritage area); and Block 10 (street widening). See Folder 192495 WET 02 OZ and 133600 WET 02 SA for related … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 50 Humberwood Boulevard.
Matched fields
- address
- 50 HUMBERWOOD BLVD
- application_address
- 50 HUMBERWOOD BLVD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 15 communications · 2 meetings · 4 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 4 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Ford | Councillor staff | 7 | 1 | 24 July 2018 |
| Councillor Michael Ford | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 16 March 2022 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke North | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 5 July 2018 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 4 May 2022 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide
16 lobbied · 48 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 48 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.