50 Humberwood Boulevard.

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 1; 1 client organisation
Communications on those registrations: 15; 4 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 6; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 1 · Vincent Crisanti
Location: 43.72265, -79.61274
How this address was located: Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 34 HUMBERWOOD BLVD (16 civic numbers away).

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Tribute CommunitiesSM26233 · 17 May 201815

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Councillor Ford7
Councillor Michael Ford5
Ward 2 Etobicoke North2
Mayor John Tory1

Data table· 4 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Ford	Councillor staff	7	1	24 July 2018
Councillor Michael Ford	Councillor staff	5	0	16 March 2022
Ward 2 Etobicoke North	Member of council	2	1	5 July 2018
Mayor John Tory	Councillor staff	1	0	4 May 2022

All registrations· 1 row

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM26233	Tribute Communities	50 Humberwood Boulevard.	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Plan of …	17 May 2018 – 17 May 2027	15

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 9 April 2021Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)Development application 21 138239 WET 01 CDClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 23 March 2021Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)Development application 21 130592 WET 01 PLClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 16 April 2019Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0218/19EYKClosed · Approved
Submitted 30 March 2016Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)Development application 16 133595 WET 02 SBClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 30 March 2016Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 16 133600 WET 02 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted 17 July 2015Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 15 192495 WET 02 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 6 rows

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
21 138239 WET 01 CD Development application	Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)	9 April 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
21 130592 WET 01 PL Development application	Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)	23 March 2021	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
A0218/19EYK Committee of Adjustment application	Minor variance (MV)	16 April 2019	Closed Approved
16 133595 WET 02 SB Development application	Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)	30 March 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
16 133600 WET 02 SA Development application	Site Plan Approval (SA)	30 March 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)
15 192495 WET 02 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	17 July 2015	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

50 Humberwood Blvd · Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)
16 133595 WET 02 SB · submitted 30 March 2016 · Closed · from registration SM26233 (Tribute Communities)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM26233: Assisting with the development of 50 Humberwood Boulevard. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 133595 WET 02 SB at 50 Humberwood Blvd: Draft Plan of Subdivision to create 10 blocks to accomodate the following: Blocks 1 - 6 (freehold townhouses); Block 7 (back-to-back townhouses); Block 8 (open space area); Block 9 (natural heritage area); and Block 10 (street widening). See Folder 192495 WET 02 OZ and 133600 WET 02 SA for related … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assisting with the development of 50 Humberwood Boulevard.
Matched fields
address
50 HUMBERWOOD BLVD
application_address
50 HUMBERWOOD BLVD

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

28 lobbied · 95 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide: 28 lobbied and 95 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	28	—	100% (n=3)	0%	0%	0.04
Matched, unlobbied	95	—	100% (n=6)	0%	0%	0.03

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 1

2 lobbied · 42 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 1: 2 lobbied and 42 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	42	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	48	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1

4 lobbied · 12 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,237 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied727

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=61
Matched, unlobbied97% n=96

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1: 4 lobbied and 12 matched unlobbied applications in 3 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	4	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,237 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=61)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,237	727	97% (n=96)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 2 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

About this address

Registrations that mention this address

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Linked lobbying registrations

Source records

Matched text

Matched fields

Council and committee items naming this address

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide

Development applications

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

Committee of Adjustment applications

Minor variance (MV), Ward 1

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

Development applications

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

Development applications

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 1

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

Development applications

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide