Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 118638 STE 28 OZ

8 Brigden Pl; 12 Brigden Pl; 78 Ontario St; 90 Ontario St; 106 Ontario St; 245 Queen St E; 257 Queen St E; 261 Queen St E; 265 Queen St E; 267 Queen St E; 269 Queen St E; 271 Queen St E; 273 Queen St E; 275 Queen St E; 277 Queen St E; 281 Queen St E; 283 Queen St E; 285 Queen St E; 348 Richmond St E; 354 Richmond St E; 360 Richmond St E; 384 Richmond St E; 410 Richmond St E; 412 Richmond St E

Ward 13 · Chris MoiseDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 19 February 2016; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 8 Brigden Pl; 12 Brigden Pl; 78 Ontario St; 90 Ontario St; 106 Ontario St; 245 Queen St E; 257 Queen St E; 261 Queen St E; 265 Queen St E; 267 Queen St E; 269 Queen St E; 271 Queen St E; 273 Queen St E; 275 Queen St E; 277 Queen St E; 281 Queen St E; 283 Queen St E; 285 Queen St E; 348 Richmond St E; 354 Richmond St E; 360 Richmond St E; 384 Richmond St E; 410 Richmond St E; 412 Richmond St E
Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Submitted: 19 February 2016
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 96,670 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

33 and 24-storey mixed-use buildings having a residential gross floor area of 96670square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 40127 square metres.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

WAM Development Group · registration SM22849
Redevelopment of Centre Honda site at 354 Richmond St. E.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22849: Redevelopment of Centre Honda site at 354 Richmond St. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 118638 STE 28 OZ at 271 Queen St E: 33 and 24-storey mixed-use buildings having a residential gross floor area of 96670square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 40127 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of Centre Honda site at 354 Richmond St. E.
Matched fields
address
354 RICHMOND ST E
application_address
354 RICHMOND ST E

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	1	1	3 March 2016

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

ONE Properties
SM25986 · 4 April 2018 · “354 Richmond St. E.”
WAM Development Group
SM22167 · 26 August 2015 · “354 Richmond St. E.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

83 lobbied · 97 matched

Median days

Lobbied—
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=10
Matched, unlobbied93% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied7%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied17%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 83 lobbied and 97 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	83	—	100% (n=10)	0%	11%	0.14
Matched, unlobbied	97	1,793	93% (n=14)	7%	17%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.