Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise

354 Richmond St E

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page

Registrations naming this address: 3; 2 client organisations
Communications on those registrations: 4; 1 offices contacted
Applications at this address: 1; 1 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items: 0; Items naming this address

About this address

Ward: Ward 13 · Chris Moise
Location: 43.65408, -79.36841
How this address was located: Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

WAM Development GroupSM22167 · 26 August 20152
ONE PropertiesSM25986 · 4 April 20181
WAM Development GroupSM22849 · 2 March 20161

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale4

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale	Member of council	4	4	6 April 2018

All registrations· 3 rows

Registration	Client	As written	Subject matter	Dates	Communications
SM25986	ONE Properties	354 Richmond St. E.	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…	4 April 2018 – 27 May 2020	1
SM22849	WAM Development Group	354 Richmond St. E.	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…	2 March 2016 – 2 January 2020	1
SM22167	WAM Development Group	354 Richmond St. E.	Planning and Development Application, Official Plan; Planning and Development Application, Zoning B…	26 August 2015 – 17 August 2020	2

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

Submitted 19 February 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 118638 STE 28 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)

Data table· 1 row

Application	Type	Submitted	Status
16 118638 STE 28 OZ Development application	Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)	19 February 2016	Closed Closed (outcome not recorded)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

271 Queen St E · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 118638 STE 28 OZ · submitted 19 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM22849 (WAM Development Group)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.79
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22849: Redevelopment of Centre Honda site at 354 Richmond St. E. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 118638 STE 28 OZ at 271 Queen St E: 33 and 24-storey mixed-use buildings having a residential gross floor area of 96670square metres, and a non-residential gross floor area of 40127 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of Centre Honda site at 354 Richmond St. E.
Matched fields
address
354 RICHMOND ST E
application_address
354 RICHMOND ST E

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13

82 lobbied · 96 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=13
Matched, unlobbied90% n=14

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied10%

Appeal rate

Lobbied11%
Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13: 82 lobbied and 96 matched unlobbied applications in 34 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	82	—	100% (n=13)	0%	11%	0.15
Matched, unlobbied	96	—	90% (n=14)	10%	16%	0.08

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.