Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ
500 Cummer Ave; 3336 A Bayview Ave; 3336 B Bayview Ave; 3336 C Bayview Ave; 3336 D Bayview Ave; 3338 A Bayview Ave; 3338 B Bayview Ave; 3338 Bayview Ave; 3338 C Bayview Ave; 3338 D Bayview Ave; 3340 A Bayview Ave; 3340 B Bayview Ave; 3340 C Bayview Ave; 3340 D Bayview Ave; 3348 A Bayview Ave; 3348 B Bayview Ave; 3348 C Bayview Ave; 3348 D Bayview Ave; 3348 E Bayview Ave; 3348 F Bayview Ave; 3348G Bayview Ave; 3348H Bayview Ave; 3348I Bayview Ave; 3348J Bayview Ave; 3348K Bayview Ave; 3348L Bayview Ave; 3348M Bayview Ave; 3348N Bayview Ave; 3348O Bayview Ave; 3348P Bayview Ave; 3348Q Bayview Ave; 3348R Bayview Ave
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 18 February 2016
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 500 Cummer Ave; 3336 A Bayview Ave; 3336 B Bayview Ave; 3336 C Bayview Ave; 3336 D Bayview Ave; 3338 A Bayview Ave; 3338 B Bayview Ave; 3338 Bayview Ave; 3338 C Bayview Ave; 3338 D Bayview Ave; 3340 A Bayview Ave; 3340 B Bayview Ave; 3340 C Bayview Ave; 3340 D Bayview Ave; 3348 A Bayview Ave; 3348 B Bayview Ave; 3348 C Bayview Ave; 3348 D Bayview Ave; 3348 E Bayview Ave; 3348 F Bayview Ave; 3348G Bayview Ave; 3348H Bayview Ave; 3348I Bayview Ave; 3348J Bayview Ave; 3348K Bayview Ave; 3348L Bayview Ave; 3348M Bayview Ave; 3348N Bayview Ave; 3348O Bayview Ave; 3348P Bayview Ave; 3348Q Bayview Ave; 3348R Bayview Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 18 February 2016
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Related file
- 13 196188 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037)
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Toronto Catholic District School Board · registration SM23637
500 Cummer Ave et.al. Rezoning application and Site Plan Approval application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23637: 500 Cummer Ave et.al. Rezoning application and Site Plan Approval application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ at 500 Cummer Ave: Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 500 Cummer Ave et.al. Rezoning application and Site Plan Approval application
Matched fields
- address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
- application_address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
Toronto Catholic District School Board · registration SM23639
500 Cummer Avenue et al Rezoning application & Site Plan Approval Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23639: 500 Cummer Avenue et al Rezoning application & Site Plan Approval Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ at 500 Cummer Ave: Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 500 Cummer Avenue et al Rezoning application & Site Plan Approval Application
Matched fields
- address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
- application_address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 9 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Shiner | Councillor staff | 7 | 1 | 21 February 2017 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 21 February 2017 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Embee Development CorporationSM17723 · 25 January 2012 · “500 Cummer Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
38 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 38 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 21% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.