lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ

500 Cummer Ave; 3336 A Bayview Ave; 3336 B Bayview Ave; 3336 C Bayview Ave; 3336 D Bayview Ave; 3338 A Bayview Ave; 3338 B Bayview Ave; 3338 Bayview Ave; 3338 C Bayview Ave; 3338 D Bayview Ave; 3340 A Bayview Ave; 3340 B Bayview Ave; 3340 C Bayview Ave; 3340 D Bayview Ave; 3348 A Bayview Ave; 3348 B Bayview Ave; 3348 C Bayview Ave; 3348 D Bayview Ave; 3348 E Bayview Ave; 3348 F Bayview Ave; 3348G Bayview Ave; 3348H Bayview Ave; 3348I Bayview Ave; 3348J Bayview Ave; 3348K Bayview Ave; 3348L Bayview Ave; 3348M Bayview Ave; 3348N Bayview Ave; 3348O Bayview Ave; 3348P Bayview Ave; 3348Q Bayview Ave; 3348R Bayview Ave

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
18 February 2016
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
9
2 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
500 Cummer Ave; 3336 A Bayview Ave; 3336 B Bayview Ave; 3336 C Bayview Ave; 3336 D Bayview Ave; 3338 A Bayview Ave; 3338 B Bayview Ave; 3338 Bayview Ave; 3338 C Bayview Ave; 3338 D Bayview Ave; 3340 A Bayview Ave; 3340 B Bayview Ave; 3340 C Bayview Ave; 3340 D Bayview Ave; 3348 A Bayview Ave; 3348 B Bayview Ave; 3348 C Bayview Ave; 3348 D Bayview Ave; 3348 E Bayview Ave; 3348 F Bayview Ave; 3348G Bayview Ave; 3348H Bayview Ave; 3348I Bayview Ave; 3348J Bayview Ave; 3348K Bayview Ave; 3348L Bayview Ave; 3348M Bayview Ave; 3348N Bayview Ave; 3348O Bayview Ave; 3348P Bayview Ave; 3348Q Bayview Ave; 3348R Bayview Ave
Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted
18 February 2016
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Related file
13 196188 SA

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037)

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 9 communications · 2 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Office of Councillor Shiner7
  • Ward 24 Willowdale2
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Office of Councillor ShinerCouncillor staff7121 February 2017
Ward 24 WillowdaleMember of council2121 February 2017

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

38 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=7
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 38 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied38—100% (n=7)0%21%0.00
Matched, unlobbied63—100% (n=3)0%15%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.