Address · Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
500 Cummer Ave
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Location
- 43.79186, -79.39438
- How this address was located
- Matched to the nearest civic number on the same street in the City's address points. Matched address: 497 CUMMER AVE (3 civic numbers away).
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Shiner | Councillor staff | 7 | 1 | 21 February 2017 |
| Ward 24 Willowdale | Member of council | 3 | 2 | 21 February 2017 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM23637 | Toronto Catholic District School Board | 500 Cummer Ave | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 21 October 2016 – 21 March 2019 | 8 |
| SM23639 | Toronto Catholic District School Board | 500 Cummer Avenue | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 21 October 2016 – 21 October 2018 | 1 |
| SM17723 | Embee Development Corporation | 500 Cummer Avenue | Planning and Development Application, Consent to Sever | 25 January 2012 – 31 July 2012 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
2- Submitted 18 February 2016Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 June 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 196188 NNY 24 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 2 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 February 2016 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 196188 NNY 24 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 June 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
500 Cummer Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 117899 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 18 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23637 (Toronto Catholic District School Board)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23637: 500 Cummer Ave et.al. Rezoning application and Site Plan Approval application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ at 500 Cummer Ave: Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 500 Cummer Ave et.al. Rezoning application and Site Plan Approval application
Matched fields
- address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
- application_address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
500 Cummer Ave · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
16 117899 NNY 24 OZ · submitted 18 February 2016 · Closed · from registration SM23639 (Toronto Catholic District School Board)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM23639: 500 Cummer Avenue et al Rezoning application & Site Plan Approval Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 16 117899 NNY 24 OZ at 500 Cummer Ave: Construct new 2-storey secondary school. Pre-existing school demolished (permit 14-185037) (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 500 Cummer Avenue et al Rezoning application & Site Plan Approval Application
Matched fields
- address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
- application_address
- 500 CUMMER AVE
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18
37 lobbied · 63 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 24% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 63 | — | 64% (n=5) | 36% | 16% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 18
18 lobbied · 125 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 18 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 125 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.